I twisted my knee. Before long it is too sore to ignore, so I check with a
physical therapist at the gym. He says he can fix it and that he is a
preferred provider on my insurance; his services will be fully covered.
So I visit him nine times over two months. My knee is better.
But my mind is boggled.
A week after the final scheduled PT session, I get a nine page so-called
“Explanation of Benefits” from my health plan. For each visit, there is
a not-a-bill on which I’m not-billed separately for Exercise Therapy,
Body Movement Therapy, and Muscle or Nerve Trai.
I’m not sure what that third item is, or if I had it, or why the provider
billed $50, the plan allows $33.46, so I owe $33.46. The Note says
“3024”. So I hunt through the pages and find a section labeled NOTES.
Here is Note 3024 (their caps): SEE THE “REHABILITATION SERVICES”
SECTION IN THE ALLOWANCE SCHEDULE OF YOUR CERTIFICATE OF
Looking further, I see on the back of each page that if I disagree
with the payment decision, I can “submit a request for appeal
within 180 days of this notice”. It should be in writing and include
copies of my medical records.
Who has their medical records?
I can’t object to the decision since I can’t determine what the
procedure is. I don’t have a clue what the price should be.
I give up and take the stack of papers to my husband; he’s a lawyer.
After a 15 minutes pouring over the pile, we conclude that this
not-a-bill says the services, including the mystery procedure “Nerve Trai”,
are covered, at least partly, but the insurer is not going to pay;
perhaps because while the individual deductible has been satisfied,
the family deductible has not. But the the employer says there is no
deductible on our plan... It seems the take home message is, “You might
get a bill.” Hardly and EOB. More like a “Not-an- Explanation of No-Benefits.
This story would suggest that, despite the PhD and 30 years in health
services, I have low health literacy. That is, I do not have the capacity
to process and understand information necessary to make appropriate
health decisions. Likewise for my husband the trial lawyer.
I’ve been impatient with the Plain Language crowd, thinking that surely
we all know about readability and jargon and all that by now.
I am wrong. Really wrong.
Keep at it Plain Language advocates!