Beginnings Guides Blog
pregnant until 2018.
That is the
current public health message from El Salvador’s health minister. Colombian
women are warned to postpone pregnancy for 6 to 8 months. Jamaica just released
similar advice. The intent is to prevent mother-to-baby transmission of Zika.
known since 1947 as a rare mild disease limited to central Africa, is spreading
rapidly across dozens of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. No one
knows why. The World Health Organization (WHO) warns Zika is likely to reach
every country in the Americas, except Canada and Chili. There is no treatment
or vaccine, largely because only about 20 percent of infected adults have any
symptoms. They might have a headache, body aches, a fever and red eyes for a
Here is the public health concern: in Brazil, since an outbreak of Zika
started there last May, more than 3800 babies have been born with microcephaly,
30 times the expected rate, according to WHO. Microcephaly is a rare birth
defect characterized by a very small head and incomplete brain development
leading to death or lifelong disability. There is little scientific evidence,
but the apparent association between Zika and microcephaly warrants public
health warnings, and delaying pregnancy seems wise. However…
The advice to women to avoid
pregnancy ignores the context in which they are expected to comply. In El Salvador and
Colombia there is little access to contraception, especially for poor rural
women. Abortion is illegal in all cases in El Salvador, where the teen
pregnancy rate is among the highest in Latin America accounting for a third of
all births. Abortion is illegal in
99% of cases in Colombia. In Jamaica, abortion is legal in some cases with the
approval of the father and two medical specialists. There is little or no sex
education in the schools. Sexual violence is prevalent. So women lack the
knowledge, services and power to heed the advice.
Colombia’s health minister explained that
his message to women is a good way to communicate risk. The minister seems to
forget that women do not become pregnant by themselves. No similar messages
have been directed to men. For sure, women who hear the warning will fear
pregnancy and birth defects more than they already do, but left to protect
themselves, this amounts to a “Just say No” campaign. It leaves women
vulnerable to blame for unplanned pregnancy and birth defects in their babies,
and to charges of non-compliance that could be misinterpreted as evidence of
low health literacy.
better message, free of gender bias, understandable and actionable, is to avoid
mosquito bites. CDC has issued Level 2 travel advisories (for all, not just pregnant women) for
the Caribbean, South and Central America, Puerto Rico, Cape Verde, Samoa and
Mexico. Travelers are advised to “practice enhanced precautions”.
In this case,
your doctor before and after travel to areas where Zika is active
insect repellant (safe and effective for pregnant women)
clothing to cover as much of your body as possible
under a mosquito net
doors and windows closed or screened
mosquitos bite in the morning, not just late afternoon and evening like other
lasts only a week or less. The danger is only to a current pregnancy. There is no danger to future
US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention www.cdc.gov/zika
. Information is being updated
Can you name
It doubles+ the risk of eight of the ten leading causes of death,
which account for about 75% of the $3Trillion Americans spend on healthcare
annually. It explains half of learning and behavior problems in children. It is
prevalent in all sectors of society, at home and around the world. It meets the
criteria for a public health crisis. Can you name it?
It is ACEs — Adverse
I’ve written here
before about ACEs. I’ve said that anyone
working in maternal-child health, or early childhood education, K-12 education,
child care, chronic disease, or health literacy needs to know about the lasting
destructive power of ACEs.
participating in the 30th Zero To Three national conference held last week here
in Seattle, I understand ACEs are not just another related issue we should
be tracking. It is time to
acknowledge and address ACEs as the biggest barrier to personal and public
health, and to improving heath literacy. As keynote speaker, pediatrician
Nadine Burke Harris says, “ We — all of us — are the solution.”
Work in all
the many fields that aim to build a strong foundation for healthy child
development is futile where ACEs cause that foundation to crumble and leave
children physically, mentally, and emotionally predisposed to impaired
cognitive and emotional development, and to adulthood defined by diabetes,
obesity, heart and lung diseases, cancers. In the context of health literacy, unacknowledged
ACEs must be viewed as a looming barrier to health across the lifecourse, to
literacy, and to effective participation in healthcare and society. It is a
multigenerational problem. A mother with unaddressed ACEs cannot buffer her
child from ACEs.
last a lifetime, for
better or worse, by default or by design. ACEs are the worse-by-default
part that Zero To Three
mantra. By definition an Adverse
Childhood Experience occurs in childhood (< age 18) and the person remembers
it as an adult. Here are the nine
types of ACEs:
* physical abuse
* sexual abuse
* emotional abuse
* mental illness of a household member
* problematic drinking or alcoholism of a
* illegal street or prescription drug use by a
* divorce or separation of a parent
* domestic violence towards a parent
* incarceration of a household member
Why ACEs matter so much for so long
These are more
than unhappy memories. A baby’s brain is only partially (about 25%) developed
at birth so that it can be wired to enable the baby to survive in the
environment into which s/he is born.
Babies absorb everything they see, hear, feel and otherwise experience.
Those experiences tell the brain what to expect and how to be ready for it. By
Baby’s first birthday, brain wiring is 70% complete, by age 3, it’s 85% wired.
So the earlier the experience, the greater and more lasting it’s impact.
repeated ACEs, four or more of the listed experiences, or the same experience
repeated frequently, the brain and all the body systems get stuck on high
alert; living in a crouch, always expecting something bad to happen. The Fight,
Flee or Freeze mechanism is designed as an emergency response system. When danger is past, it is supposed
to switch off so the body returns to a normal relaxed state. When it is stuck
in the On position, little energy and attention are available for learning and
cognitive development. Self-regulation becomes a strident challenge; behavioral
problems ensue. Eventually, the wear and tear of constant stress on the body’s
systems manifest as non-communicable adult disease. The leading causes of adult deaths worldwide have their
origins in early development. In ACEs.
Find your ACE Score:
See how ACEs have affected
you. Use the questions to generate
a reflective conversation with a mother about her ACEs and their impacts on her
life and parenting. Testing shows
the questions do not spur trauma or need for professional help. Download the questionnaire
View Dr. Burke
Harris’ TED Talk
childhood trauma affects health across a lifetime”
Next: How we can
use information about Adverse Childhood Experiences
disparities, low health literacy begin in poverty
Despite some encouraging news in the just-released annual
state rankings for child well-being, Annie E Casey Foundation reports large
numbers of children of all racial and ethnic groups are facing economic
conditions that can impede long-term success. In 2013 (latest figures) in the world's richest country, 22%
of all children
live below the poverty line —$24,250 annual
income for a family of 4. According to the Economic Policy Institute it takes
at least twice that amount to provide basic essentials. It's worse than the
average suggests. Here is where
health disparities begin: 39% of African American children, 37% of Native American children, 33% of Hispanic children
live in poverty. Compared to 14% of white children.
"When very young children experience poverty, particularly if that poverty is deep and persistent, they are at high risk of encountering difficulties later in life - having poorer adolescent health, becoming teen mothers, dropping out of school and facing poor employment outcomes."
Implications for health literacy improvement
These figures jumped out at me since preliminary findings
from my current research suggest that basic essentials —-
safe housing, adequate food, transportation, health insurance, and child care — are
prerequisites for developing maternal health literacy, mothers' ability to use
information and services to keep healthy and raise and healthy competent child.
It makes sense that no amount of reading skill, understanding of healthcare, or
knowledge of preventive practices can make those practices possible when
feeding the children necessarily takes priority. National and international
policy documents call for improving health literacy in parents to reduce health
disparities. Progress in unlikely until we provide health insurance and
economic supports to parents of very young children.
Cheers for the
Affordable Care Act
Thanks to Obamacare, the rate of insured kids improved 30%
leaving 7% or 5.2 million uninsured, most in states that declined to expand
Cheers for Alaska
Applause for Alaska governor Bill Walker. He announced last
week that he will use executive authority to expand Medicaid. That means nearly
30,000 Alaskans will soon be able obtain insurance. The annual Kids Count Datebook ranks Alaska 31 among the
states for child health. The governor's action bodes well for a higher ranking
in coming years.
Cheers for Minnesota
They're Number 1 overall in the Kids Count ratings, 2nd in
health behind Iowa.
Oh Mississippi! Worst place for kids. Still.
Mississippi ranked 50th overall as it has every year since
the rankings were first published in 1990. The state was last in economic
well-being, health, and family & community. It ranked 48th in education
ahead of New Mexico and Nevada.
See your state rankings here.
In Florida, if someone scares you
to death you can legally shoot them to death with your BLEEP. But your
family doctor or
pediatrician or health worker cannot legally ask you if a BLEEP is kept in your
house or how
it is stored.
Apparently even thinking about the
risk of unsecured BLEEPs to their children’s and
right to keep BLEEPs anywhere and any way
they want. This BLEEP has been
since 2011. (The part that made asking about BLEEPs a felony with
jail time and a $5 Million fine did not pass).
Physicians groups challenged the
law. It was upheld as constitutional in Florida since BLEEP ownership and
is a private matter unrelated to medical care.
BLEEPs and tobacco are the only
products on the market that when used correctly kill people; BLEEPS kill lots
of people, often children, in a seconds.
So BLEEPS can’t be a private matter.
Safety Checklist for a Crawler:
BLEEPS are unrelated to medical
care until a child -or some one
else- or the owner- is injured by the patients’ BLEEPs. Then
taxpayers fund emergency response and
medical care for totally
preventable horrific injury or death, and related
increased insurance premiums, and lost contributions to
And we live in fear…. Oh, I see, if you live in fear - get a BLEEP.
Texas legislature entertained a similar gag rule this month.
Death in the United States:
A Call to Action From 8 Health Professional Organizations and the American Bar Association.
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 24. doi:
10.7326/M15-0337. [Epub ahead of print]
Ferrris S. Children’s Defense Fund report on Childs’ BLEEP deaths, new BLEEP laws Data analysis: More
preschool kids dead from BLEEPfire than
police. May 19, 2014
Walters, E. Bill Would Prohibit
Doctors From Asking About BLEEPs. The Texas Tribune March 18, 2015
Pitts, L. Republican list of things you cannot say.
Seattle Times March 19, 2015
Social media and the NFL are enabling us to
reflect together on what level of aggression and violence in family
relationships is acceptable in our society. It's a fitting although
inadvertent role for the NFL, whose players are de facto role models for
American males, and whose recruiters, coaches and fans place high value on
aggression and violence on the field. (Here is Seattle, we love the defense in
Beast Mode - on the field.) The NFL's position on aggression at home is, well, evolving.
Thanks to the inventors and users of social media.
There seems to be consensus that child
abuse is unacceptable, and discipline is necessary. But the line between
discipline and abuse is defined by a complex and dynamic web of personal
beliefs, local culture, and state laws.
What is abuse?
It depends who you ask and where you are. State law
is largely focused on protecting parents' rights, and keeping the family free
of government or social interference. Social workers focus on protecting the
child from parental excess. The courts aim to balance parents' rights with
children's welfare. There's controversy regarding how much weight should be
given to potential effects on children's social and emotional wellbeing and
healthy development, on what is "normal" in the child's community, on
potential future harm, on how well the punishment fits the infraction, on a
pattern of parental behavior.
State laws are intentionally vague about what
constitutes abuse, so that cases can be decided on an individual basis.
The laws and their approaches to defining abuse vary widely. Interpretation on
the ground varies by agencies and individuals. This can result in a "I
know it when I see it" understanding of child abuse. Judging by the
Twitter traffic around Adrian Peterson, people who view the same video evidence
interpret it very differently.
How to decide?
Ultimately, parents must decide whether, when
and how to discipline their child. To me there are two important things to
bring to mind when discipline is in order. First, every young child wants to
be, tries to be like his or her parents. And every parental action teaches the
child some lesson, by default or by design.
A clear distinction for me is that disciple
is teaching by design.
It intends to teach the child appropriate behavior
and right action. Abuse is teaching by default, it aims to punish inappropriate
behavior. As a parent, the question to ask when provoked by a preschooler, or
any child, is what do I want to teach now?
Adrian Peterson said he wanted to teach his son
to be respectful and not curse at playmates. But his preschooler did not make
up those swear words. He learned them from someone he is trying to be like. And
hitting a person with a stick is about as disrespectful as one can get.
Peterson left a scar on his 4-year-old's head, which he said the child
could have avoided by not trying to get away. Would you try to get away
from a brawny footballer coming after you with a stick? I sure would. Would you
think he was abusing you or that he was teaching you appropriate social
Consider what that boy is going to say to
himself as he grows up looking in the mirror at his scar? "I want to
be respectful and polite like my dad". Probably not.
This from Beginnings Parents Guide
Part 1 Maternal health
literacy as skills
A life skill
is a collection of skills necessary for full participation in everyday life.
Maternal health literacy is a life skill that mothers use to manage personal
child health and healthcare.
It has been defined as the
cognitive & social skills
that determine a mother’s motivation and ability
to act on information in ways
that improve health (Renkert and Nutbeam, 2001).
Cognitive skills are used to
understand information; they include basic literacy skills,
numeracy (ability to use numbers). A mother might use these basic skills
learn about ear aches, and make an appointment to take her child to see a clinician.
So basic literacy skills are the essential foundation for health literacy.
Social skills are used to make
personal meaning from information, including speaking
and listening. The mother
whose child has an ear ache uses these skills when she discusses
clinician the information on ear aches to understand why her child has them and
how she might prevent them.
Reflective skills combine
cognitive and social skills to think critically, make choices,
and take action. The mother in our
example uses reflective skills when
she mulls over what the doctor said, what
she read, her experience of her child’s ear ache,
her actions and parenting
practices, and her discussion with her mother about treatment
possible preventive measures. Some literacy scholars say that reflective skills
are so essential to applying information in context that it should be
classified as a basic skill.
So we could say there are 4Rs: reading, ‘riting,
‘rithmatic, and reflection.
Health literacy means
empowerment (WHO 2013)
A health literate mother
combines all these skills to make health related choices and transform
choice into desired action and outcomes. That is the World Bank’s definition of
empowerment. Say the mother
chooses to stop putting her baby to bed with a bottle. She takes
that step, and
she enjoys her desired outcome, a happy ear-ache free baby. We say this mother
is empowered for health.
Her health literacy skills
enable her to minimize risk, maximize protective factors, and optimize
promotion. In this way, a mother’s health literacy forms the foundation for her
her child’s health throughout their lives.
Many factors, in addition to
skills, interact to determine a woman’s maternal health literacy.
More on that
beget skills. Cognitive and social skills needed to successfully manage
personal and child health and healthcare are those needed for success in
across cultures. They are skills that empower people to be what
they want to be, to make
choices and transform those choices into desired
actions and outcomes.
These life skills develop most easily
in early childhood given a stable
supportive family environment. Disparity in
brain development in children
growing in disadvantaged vs enriched environments
becomes apparent in
the first year.
Quality of family life matters more than the number of
income or education. But poverty and accumulated disadvantage
from doing their best to sustain the stimulating home
environments that support
optimal development, especially when they
themselves lack skills, resources and
role models. Early intervention ---
early childhood education, parenting
training, family support and home
visitation programs--- can produce positive
and lasting effects on children
in disadvantaged families.
Nobel Laureate and economics
professor James Heckman, makes the business
case for shifting public policy to
support programs that offer parents information,
choices and assistance. Promoting health literacy means
supplemental assistance that specifically and intentionally
enables parents to
develop and hone the range of life skills used to
participate in healthcare and
manage personal and family health at home.
Must read: Heckman, James J. (2013) Giving Kids a Fair Chance (A Strategy
That Works) MIT Press,
Cambridge, Mass. ISBN
In addition to Heckman’s monograph,
the book includes illuminating commentary
by 10 experts from multiple
The American Medical Association House
of Delegates declared obesity a disease
last month. Is this good for maternal
and child health? For public
In 1995 the National Heart Lung and
Blood Institute called obesity a “complex
multifactoral chronic disease”. Ten
years earlier, almost 30 years ago now,
NIH called prevention and treatment of
obesity a national medical priority.
With 90 million Americans now officially
obese, it seems few clinicians got the
prevention not a priority in maternity care
, I found that weighing is still the only procedure in
care that has shown any impact on outcomes. And yet it has
become uncommon for
a pregnant woman to be weighed at prenatal visits or
when being admitted to a
hospital for birth. Prenatal care providers have reported
they seldom weigh pregnant women or discuss weight for fear the conversation
interfere with their patient/provider relationship. Others said they do not know how
do it for them. One can
only hope that calling obesity a disease will change these
mothers, healthy babies. Fat mothers, fat babies
The issue in pregnancy is that a
mother with an excess of fat cells produces a baby
with an excess of fat cells. So we are building obesity
and the attendant health issues
into the next generation.
experiences - witnessing or experiencing interpersonal violence
related to obesity. A woman fearing abuse may hide in obesity, intentionally
making herself unattractive to protect herself. Is that a disease? With medical
many such women have lost weight, and gained it right back. That’s
how the lifelong
effects of ACEs were discovered.
Other mothers have said it doesn’t
matter if they gain too much in pregnancy since
they are just going to get
pregnant again; the weight can come off after that.
Only it rarelydoes.
people into patients
Google “obesity disease”. The first
thing that pops up is ad ad for weight loss surgery.
This may be more telling
than official statements.
Especially when we consider the Forbes
June 28 report that the AMA’s Council on Science
and Public Health, the group
appointed to address the question, advised against declaring
obesity a disease.
But the delegates chose ignore their own advisors.
We have to ask, what was so
Perhaps it is the implementation of
the Affordable Care Act that will bring healthcare
coverage to millions of
Americans previously excluded from the healthcare system.
At least a third of
them are obese. Now they can be patients.
According to CDC 35.7% of Americans
are obese, 49.5% of African Americans, 40% of
Mexican Americans. Rates vary
widely by state. Find your state rate at
in need of medical treatment.
Calling obesity a disease, again,
could draw attention to related health issues, but it
hasn’t in 20 years. It could result in better maternity
care, but the declaration is
unlikely to improve clinicians communication and
counseling skills. It could spark
Kennedy-style physical fitness craze, but that entails behavior change, and
communication issues. It
could increase research on obesity, but NIH already has a
Strategic Plan for
Obesity Research and funds nearly a billion
dollars worth of studies
annually. Grants.nih.gov lists 49 obesity-related
research solicitations currently open
for submission of grant
Only one thing seems certain, making
obesity a disease will increase medical treatments
and costs, and revenue to
2D, 3D or 4D. In-studio or at your
baby shower. Announce your pregnancy
with a “viewing party”. Get a video at the
mall. Post it on Facebook. Select the
premium package offered by a Miami
OB-GYN’s office and get a weekend discount.
American Institute of Ultrasound Medicine, American College of Obstetrician
and Gynecologists, American Academy of Family Physicians, March of Dimes,
Food and Drug Administration, England’s National Institute for Health and
Clinical Excellence, the UK’s
National Collaborating Centre for Women's and
Children's Health, and other
national and international experts all have published
against non-medical use of fetal ultrasound. The Society
of Obstetricians and Gynaecolgists of Canada
calls for a complete ban on non-
medical use of fetal ultrasound. The state of
Connecticut legislated a ban in 2009.
The FDA says that creating fetal
keepsake ultrasound images is “an unapproved
use of a medical device,” and
those who perform ultrasonography scans “without
a physician’s order may be in
violation of state or local laws or regulations.”
don’t need an excuse to be happy.”
Still internet ads for non-medical
ultrasounds abound, complete with slogans like
this, implying you don’t need a
medical reason for the “painless, relaxing procedure”.
The growing popularity
of “keepsake ultrasounds” is not due to cost or access issues.
companies pay for one or two doctor-ordered ultrasounds as part of
prenatal care, and commercial ultrasound is not cheap.
start at $175 for the 3D in-studio option. $500 for an “ultrasound party”
the location of your choice. The cheapest rate I saw was $75 for a basic
determination” scan; it’s discounted to $55 on Saturdays one OB-GYN’s office. These
services are not regulated or standardized.
sonographers say that ultrasound is safe. I found unclear statements like:
“All research provided has been proven to
be safe for expectant mothers and baby,
as long as the procedure is done by a
trained professional, and no longer that one
hour intervals.” First, we have to ask, research provided by
whom? and What about
the research that was not provided? Second, remember that no research ever proves
anything. It can only
offer statistical evidence. Then, a more accurate statement is
ultrasounds have not been proven harmful. Still the evidence has
convinced all the advisory and regulatory
agencies that entertainment ultrasounds
uses sound waves, not xrays. So radiation is not the issue. But the procedure
targets the fetus with heat and
pressure, especially prolonged, 4-D studies. New York
proposed a ban on ultrasonography for entertainment purposes, citing
showing that 4Dl ultrasound equipment can emit eight times more energy than the
machines commonly used in medical settings. The risk of effects on fetal development
demonstrated in both human and animal models, and remains, at least
so that the FDA
concludes exposing the fetus to ultrasound with no anticipation of medical
benefit is not justified.
concerns about non-medical ultrasonography include the possibility that
medical ultrasonography will fail to identify a problem with the baby,
the patient and her family; or that a false-positive result
could create unnecessary anxiety
and follow-up testing. Machines are
unregulated so may not be properly calibrated or
maintained. Technicians may
not be well-trained or proficient. “gender determination”
had never been an
accepted use of of ultrasound technology and raises thorny ethical issues.
are for doctors
Here’s the problem: In medical settings, the sonographer is commonly prohibited
explaining ultrasound results to the patient, who must then wait for days
or weeks to get the
results from the physician who ordered the scan. Family
members may be barred from attending
the ultrasound appointment to avoid
congestion in the radiology department. Parents may not
receive still pictures
or video to take home. If they do, they still cannot send it to a friend or
it online. Until these
disempowering practices change, parents and sonographers
to seek a more informative, convenient, family friendly experience.
Check Technician’s Credentials
sonographers are trained and certified. Find one, or check a technician’s
Pregnancy Guides says, “Ultrasound is
safe for you and Baby.” [p8] That
The 2014 edition will add this statement: Many healthy pregnancies do not need
ultrasounds may be harmful. The Registry of credentialed sonographers
Don't Order Fetal Ultrasound Videos As Souvenirs: FDA
infants show preference for others in distress
10 months of age, babies differentiate attackers from victims and neutral
They literally reach out to victims. Their second choice is a neutral
party. They avoid attackers.
scientific experiments by Japanese researchers, the players were shapes on a
like the early Pac-man games. The researchers suggest the
infants’ preference for the victim is the
foundation for sympathy.
negative impact as
experiencing it directly. This seems to be so even on an infant. The study
certainly confirms that babies observe and are shaped by what is happening
power of choosing
experiment further suggests a very early start for what David Emerald (The
Dynamic) describes as humans’ default way of looking at the world.
It’s a survival mechanism. In
order to keep us alive, our brains are pre-set to
keep us focused on problems and threats. Anything
unfamiliar or unexpected (including an aggressive square) is considered a threat, even as early as
months. Brain imaging shows that upon detecting a threat, real or imagined, the
brain floods the
body with chemicals to produce anxiety. It gives us just three
choices of how to react: fight, flee
or freeze. No thinking is involved.
Anxiety is the prime motivator,
and our default state.
writes that It takes intention and attention to notice when we are reacting
to anxiety, and to instead choose a purposeful response to the
source of the anxiety. A habit of
observing and choosing is the key. The process of choosing takes us out of
survival mode and
activates critical thinking.
together, these works make clear the importance of allowing very young children to make
choices. Even before they begin to
talk or to understand. Hold up two
shirts. Ask, red shirt or
green? Let Baby point. When out for a walk, ask Baby
which way he wants to go. He can point.
Maybe not the first time. But probably
sooner than you think.
choices and translating those choices into desired actions and outcomes” - that
definition of empowerment.
Kanakogi Y, Okumura Y, Inoue Y, Kitazaki M et al.
(2013) Rudimentary Sympathy in Preverbal Infants: Preference for Others
Distress.PLoSONE 8(6): e65292, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065292
Emerald, D. (2006). The power of TED: The Empowerment
Island, WA: Polaris Press.
World Bank. (2005). "What is